Under whose turn it is, seventeen died in Ischia in a Colaton of mud that was triggered by the posting of a piece of the hill.
Here's another. This time, however, the species is another thing: Since the time only one is dead one day in the newspapers. Apparently a 17 year old girl died in a mudslide does not make the same news that the dead "Messina" or maybe it's better for the time to dedicate to who the new governor of Campania, or those who trumpet. The dead are dead so they do not vote and vote again.
Anger is in the fact that the situation is always same: downstream of the detachment had been dug out 300 cubic meters of land without authorization. Then usciamocene like this: if they are looking for! Yes, because the nice thing is that there may not think to make the controls (and the laws we have) no, because the controls do not control units do not have the money!
News on Sunday is a wonderful press conference Environment Minister, Stefania Prestigiacomo, who told La Repubblica as many pretty pennies to be invested for the control of the territory ( http://ricerca.repubblica.it/ repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/11/06/frane-una-mappa-di-case-fiumi-con.html ) through the technology of laser scanning plane. I quote the headline " aircraft on patrol at 6000 meters, mini helicopters flying at 300 meters 'height. And' training for war to landslides and floods." And after 4 lines continues, "The technique of laser scanning is used by submarines and copy capabilities developed by the bats to measure with great precision in the dark, the space available ...". It is a pity that the laser beam propagates in water, is the only case of total reflection of electromagnetic radiation physics ... Brava minister, really good!
A party that is not true that it is the first time you use this technology for monitoring landslides (and this blog they have the proof!), except that submarines use the radar for the location (and the radar can be used for monitoring landslides, as described in more posts of this blog), but the problem is a ' more.
If those who have to allocate money for monitoring has not quite understand how to do it and what is the monitoring and especially what and how much money they are really needed, we really really bad.
Vitrociset incidentally will pocket € 9.4 million, a little lot in my opinion.
While no less the problem is always the same, because after you do all the scouting landslides with € 9.4 million given to Vitrociset (just connect geo ale the European community to have the same data for free ...), then the choices are always the ones to do a better amnesty. And it turns out that even in Ischia the same money had been allocated to replace all the Walloons, who sin have never been spent. So what's the problem? The problem is always the same: there is a minimum of Programmatic in these choices, there is an environmental approach is shared among all entities involved in the area and there is absolutely no attention especially if it happens when the misfortune, and even there only and only for a limited period of time.
By the way, does anyone know how I have finished the houses of Messina? Someone has noticed that is not talked about more? What our administrators have spent all the money on clothes and on crutches spumantino CASE of the Eagle?
I stop here, to you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment